From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: commit after dead lock |
Date: | 2004-01-30 09:47:29 |
Message-ID: | 401A2831.10005@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
>
>>It's not really any different than other errors. The commit doesn't
>>complain (although it also doesn't actually commit anything).
>
>
> People have occasionally suggested that the command tag from a COMMIT
> should read "ABORT" or "ROLLBACK" if the transaction was previously
> aborted. I don't have a strong feeling about it one way or the other.
> It'd clearly be helpful for human users, but I could see it confusing
> programs that expect the existing behavior of command tag always
> matching command.
Well, I agree but I think that is better at least rise a
warning.
regards
Geetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trevor Astrope | 2004-01-30 14:48:28 | Veritas Filesystem |
Previous Message | supiah | 2004-01-30 09:41:57 | Error during installation |