Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: missing chunk number 0 for toast value

From: "BJ Taylor" <btaylor(at)propertysolutions(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing chunk number 0 for toast value
Date: 2008-09-24 21:46:49
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-admin
We are using version 8.3.1.  And to be precise, when I started the vacuum
(analyze), I started it as a cron job to run daily around midnight.  The
next day I came in and checked on it and it was still running.  Not thinking
that it would take more than a full 24 hours to run, I let it be, and the
next day I came in and the server started acting weird.  I believe the
vacuum process continued to run, and a second vacuum process was started.
The server became unstable, and refused incoming connections.  At which
point, I killed all vacuum processes, and restarted postgresql.  I believe
it was somewhere during this process that the database became corrupted.  I
am not certain what happens when two vacuum processes run at the same time.
That may have been the problem, or it may not have.  Or it may have been
that I killed the vacuum process in the middle of what it was doing.  One
way or another, the problem that we have now, is that we are unable to get a
dump of the database for backups, and the database seems less stable than it
was previously (dropping connections, and refusing connections seemingly at


On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "BJ Taylor" <btaylor(at)propertysolutions(dot)com> writes:
> > Our database seems to have been corrupted.  It is a heavily used
> database,
> > and went several months without any type of vacuuming.  When we finally
> > realized that it wasn't being vacuumed, we started the process, but the
> > process never successfully completed, and our database has never been the
> > same since.
> What PG version is this?  Exactly what do you mean by "never
> successfully completed"?
>                        regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Carol WalterDate: 2008-09-24 23:23:22
Subject: Not out of the woods yet - but almost...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-09-24 20:26:39
Subject: Re: missing chunk number 0 for toast value

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group