Tom Lane wrote:
> I think there is something wrong with your setup procedures, because
> I've never needed such. (I've corresponded with Joe off-list about
> this --- maybe we can produce a FAQ about the right way to do it once
> the dust settles.)
Yup, got it.
> AFAICS this would defeat the documented behavior of being able to set
> PGHOST/PGPORT in the environment to control which postmaster "make
> installcheck" will speak to. So, yeah, I think it's a bad idea.
OK. I'll see about playing with the scripts you sent me.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2003-11-26 08:42:30|
|Subject: Re: make installcheck on non-default ports|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-11-26 05:50:19|
|Subject: Re: make installcheck on non-default ports |