From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New version of money type |
Date: | 2006-09-28 15:25:45 |
Message-ID: | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D03EA23B0@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oic - so it's a floating point in an 8 byte int. That probably limits the speed benefits, no?
- Luke
Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo
-----Original Message-----
From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain [mailto:darcy(at)druid(dot)net]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:14 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Luke Lonergan
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:09:17 -0400
"Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
> Though this may be the kiss of death, I favor a 64 bit float version of money. It's more terse than numeric and a
I assume you mean "...64 bit INT version..."
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2006-09-28 15:32:37 | Re: New version of money type |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2006-09-28 15:15:00 | Re: New version of money type |