Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org

From: Ewald Geschwinde <webmaster(at)geschwinde(dot)net>
To: Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,"Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org
Date: 2003-01-06 19:55:38
Message-ID: 3E19DF3A.9060800@geschwinde.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
Ok we vote and that who vote against it are paying the costs
no problem from that point of view


And with that opinion: "other sites don't have banners"
www.postgresql.org is no other site.
If we can improve webpages with the income of the ads why not.
All talk about marketing ... ADS ARE SOME KIND OF MARKETING

It's an honor that someone wants to place ads on a site cause then the 
site is viewed by many people.

regards Ewald


Medi Montaseri schrieb:

> I don't like ads....
>
> How about a vote....
>
> The problem with Ads is who gets to decide what goes....where do we 
> darw the lines,
> And all that greed vs solution for the sake of solution comes in...
> The Operating Expenses needs to be solved a different way....including 
> tax deductable
> contributioins....
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>>  
>>
>>> There were always ads on the mirror page at www.postgresql.org -- but I
>>> agree with you that the presence of ads in any form is not ideal. I
>>> raised the issue on -hackers yesterday, and it's being discussed ATM...
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Personally, I'm in favor of ads if it is needed to offset the cost of 
>> hosting, and as long as the advertisers are companies which support 
>> Open Source.
>>
>> In fact, I was thinking of buying an ad myself.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
>



In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gavin M. RoyDate: 2003-01-06 20:05:17
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org
Previous:From: Philip HallstromDate: 2003-01-06 19:53:06
Subject: Re: www.postgresql.org

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gavin M. RoyDate: 2003-01-06 20:05:17
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org
Previous:From: Philip HallstromDate: 2003-01-06 19:53:06
Subject: Re: www.postgresql.org

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group