Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date: 2002-08-31 00:28:41
Message-ID: 3D700DB9.2060008@joeconway.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> The fix actually uses the "expected tuple desc" that's now passed by
> ExecMakeTableFunctionResult as the target descriptor.  This should mean
> that it'd be possible to support plpgsql functions returning RECORD, but
> I didn't have time to look into that.  Anyone want to try?

I haven't really looked too closely at Neil plpgsql stuff, so I'm a bit 
concerned with the spin-up time I'd need to figure this out. But if Neil 
doesn't show up and volunteer between now and Saturday morning, I'll 
take a look.

Joe


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-08-31 05:49:57
Subject: Re: create or replace rule/view (fwd)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-31 00:23:18
Subject: Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group