From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS |
Date: | 2002-07-20 14:51:35 |
Message-ID: | 3D3978F7.90601@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>
>>It sorts on "Schema" first, and "Name" second.
>
>
>>Sample output:
>> List of relations
>> Name | Schema | Type | Owner
>>--------------------+------------+------+----------
>> __testpassbyval | public | view | postgres
>> fooview | public | view | postgres
>> master_pg_proc | public | view | postgres
>> rmt_pg_proc | public | view | postgres
>> vw_dblink_get_pkey | public | view | postgres
>> vw_dblink_replace | public | view | postgres
>> ts_view | testschema | view | postgres
>
>
> It seems rather odd and confusing that the sort order takes the second
> column as the major key. I think that the sort ordering should be
> column 1 then 2. That means either putting the schema column first,
> or keeping this column ordering and sorting on relname before schema.
> I lean towards the first choice but can see a case for the second.
>
> regards, tom lane
OK -- I see your point on the second option, but I also lean towards the
first. I'll change it to schema column first, order by column 1 then 2.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-20 14:52:50 | Re: show() function - updated patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-20 14:27:48 | Re: show() function - updated patch |