Tom Lane wrote:
> Comments?  Is 2.4.7 simply broken and returning the wrong errno?
> If not, what should we do?

You will most surely experiment memory management (Virtual Memory) problems with
any Linux Kernel v. 2.4.x with x<15 or so. Try again using 2.4.15 or higher.

Regards,
Haroldo.

In response to

• shmctl portability problem at 2002-01-04 01:47:53 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Dwayne Miller	Date: 2002-01-04 03:06:50
	Subject: Time keyword
Previous:	From: Kenny H Klatt	Date: 2002-01-04 02:35:11
	Subject: Transaction tests on SMP Linux