Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'Jason Tishler'" <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Date: 2001-12-13 15:08:57
Message-ID: 3C18C489.CC1266D3@fourpalms.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwinpgsql-hackers
...
> > The above is a known MS Winsock limitation and is documented
> > in FAQ_MSWIN:
...
> Aww nuts. I should have thought of that. I'll try again on a Win2K server.

Jason and Dave, would y'all consider this a tested and supported
platform then? I'd like to correctly represent this in the ports list in
the docs for this release, but don't recall having seen a report such as
"Win+Cygwin work as well as they ever have"...

                      - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-12-13 15:16:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-12-13 14:21:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-12-13 15:16:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous:From: Lee KindnessDate: 2001-12-13 15:00:53
Subject: Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group