Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Use of 'now'

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
Date: 2001-11-14 07:08:34
Message-ID: 3BF21872.F90FEB6A@fourpalms.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
...
> Hmm.  It was *supposed* to be removed entirely, but possibly what
> Thomas actually did was to continue to accept the keyword as equivalent
> to 'now'.  Thomas?

Not sure where "supposed to" came from ;)

Previous versions of PostgreSQL can and will generate dump files which
have 'current'. I did make it equivalent to 'now' for at least the 7.2
series of releases.

                     - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-11-14 07:23:30
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-11-14 03:58:48
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-11-14 07:23:30
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
Previous:From: Ivan BabikovDate: 2001-11-14 05:59:56
Subject: Is there an API reference for Postgres? What about 2-phase transactions?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group