Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions

From: Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epa(dot)gov>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Date: 2001-07-12 18:41:01
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Might as well just get rid of that one; Peter's right about the security hole.

The simplest fix I see is to allow SET AUTHORIZATION only in superuser-owned
functions. It would still be potentially useful that way. Doing this the
"right" way (with users needing regrantable privileges, etc.) would involve
too much effort for too little reward, IMHO. 


Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am backing out this SET AUTHORIZATION patch until we can resolve the
> security issues.  It will remain in the patch queue at:

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-07-12 18:42:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-07-12 18:26:53
Subject: Re: python installation patch.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group