Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Date: 2001-01-24 22:25:44
Message-ID: 3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> No, it cannot be static.
>

Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
used directly. It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them. But the
performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
the code, so I don't suggest it.

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 23:01:38 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Previous Message Poul Kristensen 2001-01-24 21:58:33 Sv: Postgres ODBC

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 23:01:38 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-24 22:22:07 Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-01-24 22:35:48 Additional ODBC patch
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2001-01-24 21:56:54 Re: [PATCHES] Re: Patch for JDBC timestamp problems