Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 18:07:45
Message-ID: 3A23F471.7C024163@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

> To fix this you simply need to double-quote "overlaps" when it's used as a
> straight function call. See how substring does it in pg_proc.h.

Hmm. Why was this required for the substring() example? afaik all of
this should be handled (correctly) in the grammar...

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-11-28 18:12:27 Re: beta testing version
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-28 17:20:48 Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-28 18:20:42 Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-11-28 17:20:48 Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice