Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Date: 2000-11-28 18:07:45
Message-ID: 3A23F471.7C024163@alumni.caltech.edu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
> To fix this you simply need to double-quote "overlaps" when it's used as a
> straight function call.  See how substring does it in pg_proc.h.

Hmm. Why was this required for the substring() example? afaik all of
this should be handled (correctly) in the grammar...

                    - Thomas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-11-28 18:20:42
Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-11-28 17:20:48
Subject: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mitch VincentDate: 2000-11-28 18:12:27
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-11-28 17:20:48
Subject: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group