Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
> > What I'm proposing is that once an xact has touched a
> > table, other xacts should not be able to apply schema updates to that
> > table until the first xact commits.
> No, this would mean too many locks, and would leave the dba with hardly a
> chance to alter a table.
Are there many applications which have many SELECT statements(without
FOR UPDATE) in one tx ?
As for locks,weak locks doesn't pass intensive locks. Dba seems to be able
to alter a table at any time.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2000-10-23 09:48:35|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: Announcing PgSQL - a Python DB-API 2.0
compliant interface to PostgreSQLL|
|Previous:||From: Larry Rosenman||Date: 2000-10-23 09:34:42|
|Subject: Re: testing my connection to list.|