Tom Lane wrote:
> Chris <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> >> the grammar is just plain not LR(1) unless you
> >> count UNION JOIN as a single token.
> > Would it be bad to make UNION JOIN as a single token?
> That's exactly the solution I'm proposing. However, it's pretty painful
> to make the lexer do it directly (consider intervening comments, for
Comments are a pain in the parser. What if something prior to the lexer
filtered out comments before either the lexer or parser could see them?
Would it be as easy as s/--.*// before the lexer?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Chris||Date: 2000-08-29 01:07:25|
|Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-08-29 00:27:27|
|Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT |