Re: pgaccess installation layout

From: Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgaccess installation layout
Date: 2000-06-26 06:10:03
Message-ID: 3956F3BB.CDDDCCDF@flex.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Pgaccess currently installs its accessory files into PREFIX/pgaccess,
> which isn't really compatible with standard Unix file system layouts. From
> my reading of things the proper place for it would be
> PREFIX/share/pgaccess. This does not affect users since the file path is
> substituted into the pgaccess executable at build time. Protests?
>
> (Pedants might point out that part of pgaccess should go into
> PREFIX/libexec, but we can worry about that later.)

I can't say if it's ok or if not. If you think that it's ok and
PostgreSQL developers agree, let's put it there.
I don't know the meaning of .../share/ directory and what the standards
are.

Best regards,
Teo

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-26 06:43:27 Re: ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right ops are rel-vars
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-06-26 05:30:40 Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)