From: | Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgaccess installation layout |
Date: | 2000-06-26 06:10:03 |
Message-ID: | 3956F3BB.CDDDCCDF@flex.ro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Pgaccess currently installs its accessory files into PREFIX/pgaccess,
> which isn't really compatible with standard Unix file system layouts. From
> my reading of things the proper place for it would be
> PREFIX/share/pgaccess. This does not affect users since the file path is
> substituted into the pgaccess executable at build time. Protests?
>
> (Pedants might point out that part of pgaccess should go into
> PREFIX/libexec, but we can worry about that later.)
I can't say if it's ok or if not. If you think that it's ok and
PostgreSQL developers agree, let's put it there.
I don't know the meaning of .../share/ directory and what the standards
are.
Best regards,
Teo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-26 06:43:27 | Re: ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right ops are rel-vars |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-06-26 05:30:40 | Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?) |