Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer

From: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
To: "'hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer
Date: 1999-08-20 21:11:51
Message-ID: 37BDC497.F4ADE095@udmnet.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> writes:
> > Sorry, Tom, I saw the tgl initals, and assumed it was you, before realising
> > that there are a couple of people who could be identified by those initials.
>
> All of those are Lockhart. I recall having done something with the
> string-constant lexing, but I have no idea what this <xm> is all about.

BTW, one more stu-u-u-upid question: why unary minus needs high
precedence? Seems that all works well without any specified
precedence for uminus ;) - it is only a remark.

--
Leon.
---------
"This may seem a bit weird, but that's okay, because it is weird." -
Perl manpage.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-08-21 02:15:09 sorting by << correct for rtrees?
Previous Message Hub.Org News Admin 1999-08-20 20:37:34