Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer

From: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
To: "'hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer
Date: 1999-08-20 21:11:51
Message-ID: 37BDC497.F4ADE095@udmnet.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> writes:
> > Sorry, Tom, I saw the tgl initals, and assumed it was you, before realising
> > that there are a couple of people who could be identified by those initials.
> 
> All of those are Lockhart.  I recall having done something with the
> string-constant lexing, but I have no idea what this <xm> is all about.

BTW, one more stu-u-u-upid question: why unary minus needs high 
precedence? Seems that all works well without any specified
precedence for uminus ;)  - it is only a remark.

-- 
Leon.
---------
"This may seem a bit weird, but that's okay, because it is weird." -
Perl manpage.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-08-21 02:15:09
Subject: sorting by << correct for rtrees?
Previous:From: Hub.Org News AdminDate: 1999-08-20 20:37:34
Subject:

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group