Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-14 16:39:08
Message-ID: 3698.1087231148@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Right, we can just close the pipe.  I was thinking of adding another
> signal but that's obviously easier.  Will work on making this happen.

... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Gary DoadesDate: 2004-06-14 17:59:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-14 16:27:02
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group