Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml
Date: 2010-12-16 03:41:10
Message-ID: 3675.1292470870@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm.  I'm inclined to just remove that sentence.  The fact that you
> can make the operation fail by pointing it at someplace where there's
> not a server listening doesn't really seem to merit a disclaimer.  I
> think waiting IS a well-defined operation now; it just won't succeed
> if you configure it in a way that doesn't make sense.

+1

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-12-17 00:11:49
Subject: Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-12-16 02:10:00
Subject: Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group