From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bernard Frankpitt <frankpit(at)pop(dot)dn(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch for user-defined C-language functions |
Date: | 1999-09-28 13:45:30 |
Message-ID: | 365.938526330@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, where are we on this?
It's in my to-do queue. I have to touch the same files anyway in order
to make the world safe for constant-folding, because right now CREATE
FUNCTION only lets you specify the ISCACHABLE flag for a C-language
routine. Need to open that up for all languages, and document it.
I was waiting for Thomas, because I had understood some of his remarks
to mean that he was busy doing a major rearrangement of code in the
parser, but he told me last night to go ahead and commit these changes.
So it should get done shortly.
regards, tom lane
>> Bernard Frankpitt <frankpit(at)pop(dot)dn(dot)net> writes:
>>>> The solution that I propose, and have implemented in the attatched
>>>> patch extends the CREATE FUNCTION syntax as follows.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-09-28 14:11:04 | Re: RI and PARSER (was: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1) |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-09-28 13:43:00 | Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 |