Re: Two points about docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vladimir Chukharev <chu(at)kemia(dot)me(dot)tut(dot)fi>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two points about docs
Date: 2005-05-11 13:59:52
Message-ID: 3525.1115819992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> ! consistent between the various implementations. This chapter is also
> ! not exhaustive; additional functions appear in relivant sections of
> ! the manual.

"relevant", please.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2005-05-11 14:01:10 Re: Two points about docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-11 13:39:08 Re: Two points about docs