> > Sounds like the plan internally grew (possible w/subselect stuff?!?) and
> > has gone over that 8k limit.
>
>     I think it must be due to the cleanups in the node-print and
>     read funcs. They now output/read ALL fields in the nodes.

Oh, I didn't realize that the print functions were actually used for something
other than printing and debugging. I had started to add a few new nodes when I
was trying to debug the "primary key" code.

Should we go through and bracket some of those with #ifdef QUERYDEBUG or
something like that? Where are they actually used? Should we try to keep these
at a minimum for production compiles of the system??

                                           - Tom

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views? at 1998-03-02 08:02:05 from Jan Wieck

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views? at 1998-03-02 17:05:15 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Thomas G. Lockhart	Date: 1998-03-02 14:02:31
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CURRENT_USER
Previous:	From: Maarten Boekhold	Date: 1998-03-02 10:56:11
	Subject: Perl module installs in wrong place