Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement

From: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 18:26:31
Message-ID: 330532b6050503112651baac8c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
On 4/30/05, Jim C. Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> 
> If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
> pgfoundry on then? :)

If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.

I'm running MamboForge.net, and the poor thing is getting beat into
the cold hard earth every day. We (Mambo) should really have two
servers, at least to dedicate hardware to the database. Most of the
servers in that class are dual Xeons as well - just as an indicator of
what you are getting yourselves into ;-)

Contact me directly if you have any questions about Gforge and
administration or load.

-- Mitch

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2005-05-03 18:33:30
Subject: Bogus assertion in multixact.c?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-05-03 18:26:28
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-05-03 18:34:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-05-03 18:26:28
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group