Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org,Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not
Date: 2002-04-24 04:56:31
Message-ID: 3293.1019624191@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ... I guess the question is whether 
> or not unknownin/out should be marked proimplicit = 't' or not.

AFAIR there are no I/O routines that should be marked proimplicit = 't'.
We don't allow "C string" to be handled as part of the type system,
and until we do it doesn't make any sense to allow implicit conversions
to or from "C string".

The oprsanity tests are still a few bricks shy of a load w.r.t. the
recent pg_proc and namespace changes --- I hope to add more checks soon.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-24 05:02:49
Subject: Re: regression tests for ALTER TABLE ... DEFAULT
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-04-24 04:47:53
Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group