Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Do we have any guideline about the message for identifier names?
The issue has come up before. I think that what we really need here is
to implement additional fields in error message reports, so that the
name and schema name of the relevant object can be pulled out of the
message by programs without having to parse the message text. If we had
that, it would reduce the pressure to clutter the basic message text
this way. It would also improve our compliance with the SQL standard,
which says you're supposed to do it like that.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-01-12 14:35:29|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions|
|Previous:||From: Boszormenyi Zoltan||Date: 2010-01-12 14:23:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs|