Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Date: 2005-04-01 00:08:43
Message-ID: 2e597ed0f110e5727e7bf48ba00bcb4f@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Wouldn't bother me -- I'd rather see what's there and make the
> "uninteresting" call myself, if that's the only reason for not
> showing the I/O functions.  It's not like they'd overwhelm the
> output.

This could work out well with my upcoming patch to have \df only
show non-system functions. Since the user will in the future have
to explicitly call \dfS to see the system functions, 60 extra
out of 1700 should not matter too much.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200503311907
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCTJESvJuQZxSWSsgRAkT+AKC7sDDWkXskD1O+ZkLpsY9U22sSuACeNR6b
jXv/PkOJBQ03j/JX5NBNkIc=
=5Pzo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-04-01 00:32:40
Subject: Re: Hash vs. HashJoin nodes
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-03-31 23:41:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-04-01 02:22:33
Subject: Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-03-31 23:41:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group