Re: Making serial survive pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making serial survive pg_dump
Date: 2002-06-13 21:41:07
Message-ID: 29925.1024004467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> Ok, keeping the setval is appropriate. Are there any problems with a
> SERIAL(<sequence name>) implementation?

What for? The sequence name is an implementation detail, not something
we want to expose (much less let users modify).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jack 2002-06-13 21:41:17 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH SSL_pending() checks in libpq/fe-misc.c
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-06-13 21:30:30 Re: Making serial survive pg_dump