Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address
Date: 2011-06-22 14:17:09
Message-ID: 29222.1308752229@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Another option might be to leave heap_openrv() and relation_openrv()
> alone and add a missing_ok argument to try_heap_openrv() and
> try_relation_openrv().

+1 for that, although the try_ prefix might be inappropriate naming
now; how about cond_relation_openrv?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-22 14:28:19 Re: Repeated PredicateLockRelation calls during seqscan
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-22 14:16:28 Re: WIP pgindent replacement