Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:39:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You would have been better off keeping the array and sorting it so you
>> could use binary search, instead of passing the problem off to the
>> filesystem.

> Well, testing showed using open() was a big win.

... on the filesystem you tested on.  I'm concerned that it might not
look so good on other platforms.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, copy fsm, vm, and extent files by checking for fi at 2012-11-14 22:58:14 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, copy fsm, vm, and extent files by checking for fi at 2012-11-14 23:28:41 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jeff Davis	Date: 2012-11-14 23:24:17
	Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-11-14 22:58:14
	Subject: Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, copy fsm, vm, and extent files by checking for fi

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-11-14 23:28:41
	Subject: Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, copy fsm, vm, and extent files by checking for fi
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-11-14 22:58:14
	Subject: Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, copy fsm, vm, and extent files by checking for fi