Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2007-05-24 05:16:34
Message-ID: 28417.1179983794@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> There are some places that it doesn't use PG style (e.g. no newline 
> before brace after if) and some comments that need to be fixed (e.g. /* 
> XXX get result */ )

Of course you both realize pgindent will take care of the former ;-).
But yes, bogus comments are worth the trouble to fix now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Shachar ShemeshDate: 2007-05-24 05:24:58
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-05-24 03:59:37
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-05-24 17:17:47
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-05-24 03:59:37
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group