Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2010-01-24 18:06:16
Message-ID: 28415.1264356376@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects,
>> say 5 million simple functions.
 
> So the current database is expendable?

Yeah, I think it was a bad experimental design anyway...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2010-01-24 18:09:54
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-24 18:04:22
Subject: Re: Resetting a single statistics counter

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group