"Warren Turkal" <wturkal(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have created the following patch in an effort to start cleaning up
> the timestamp datatype. Please let me know if something like this will
> help so that I know whether to keep going. BTW, it passes a "make
> check" AFAICT.

Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
This seems like a bad factorization ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• timestamp typedefs at 2008-01-04 04:15:54 from Warren Turkal

Responses

• Re: timestamp typedefs at 2008-01-04 04:54:04 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-01-04 04:54:04
	Subject: Re: timestamp typedefs
Previous:	From: Warren Turkal	Date: 2008-01-04 04:15:54
	Subject: timestamp typedefs