Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: timestamp typedefs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Warren Turkal" <wturkal(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timestamp typedefs
Date: 2008-01-04 04:41:47
Message-ID: 28369.1199421707@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Warren Turkal" <wturkal(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have created the following patch in an effort to start cleaning up
> the timestamp datatype. Please let me know if something like this will
> help so that I know whether to keep going. BTW, it passes a "make
> check" AFAICT.

Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
This seems like a bad factorization ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-04 04:54:04
Subject: Re: timestamp typedefs
Previous:From: Warren TurkalDate: 2008-01-04 04:15:54
Subject: timestamp typedefs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group