Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 7.0 vacuum problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marcin Inkielman <marn(at)wsisiz(dot)edu(dot)pl>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 7.0 vacuum problem
Date: 2000-08-30 21:41:04
Message-ID: 28290.967671664@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Marcin Inkielman <marn(at)wsisiz(dot)edu(dot)pl> writes:
> NOTICE:  FlushRelationBuffers(osoby, 182): block 186 is referenced
> (private 0, global 3)
> FATAL 1:  VACUUM (vc_repair_frag): FlushRelationBuffers returned -2

(and similar reports from other people)

I think the source of this problem has finally been identified.
See the patch I just posted on pgsql-patches.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2000-08-30 22:14:10
Subject: Re: function
Previous:From: Marcin MazurekDate: 2000-08-30 21:16:12
Subject: Re: rules or trigers?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group