Re: minor view creation weirdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: minor view creation weirdness
Date: 2003-10-03 17:26:07
Message-ID: 28239.1065201967@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Uhm, doesn't the spec have anything to say about this?
> I mean, the view sure looks like standard SQL on its face.

Well, you might read the spec as requiring the view column to have
datatype CHAR(n) where n is the length of the unknown literal.
I see in SQL92:

9) The data type of a <character string literal> is fixed-length
character string. The length of a <character string literal>
is the number of <character representation>s that it contains.
...
Note: <character string literal>s are allowed to be zero-length
strings (i.e., to contain no characters) even though it is
not permitted to declare a <data type> that is CHARACTER with
<length> zero.

The NOTE would appear to imply that

CREATE VIEW v AS SELECT '';

is illegal, which is not a conclusion I care to follow blindly. In any
case, in Postgres I would think we would want to take the type as "text"
not "CHAR(n)", spec or no spec.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-03 18:32:56 initdb
Previous Message Gottfried F. Zojer 2003-10-03 17:22:39 Re: Question regarding coopting Database Engine