Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
Date: 2005-03-11 03:58:27
Message-ID: 28236.1110513507@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
>>> Please see my posting about using a macro for snprintf.

> Wasn't the issue about odd behavior of the Win32 linker choosing the wrong
> vnsprintf?

You're right, the point about the macro was to avoid linker weirdness on
Windows.  We need to do that part in any case.  I think Bruce confused
that issue with the one about whether our version supported %n$
adequately ... which it doesn't just yet ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-03-11 04:10:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-03-11 03:40:09
Subject: Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-03-11 04:10:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-03-11 03:54:50
Subject: Re: trivial refactoring of WaitOnLock

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-03-11 04:10:12
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Previous:From: pgsqlDate: 2005-03-11 01:29:49
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group