Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote:
>> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here:
>> how about "silent"? A silent function being one that will not blab.
> I also made this suggestion later in the day.
SILENT isn't a bad idea. It seems to lead the mind in the right
direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2012-02-22 23:36:48|
|Subject: Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC|
|Previous:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-02-22 23:17:53|
|Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2|