Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote:
>> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here:
>> how about "silent"?  A silent function being one that will not blab.

> I also made this suggestion later in the day.

SILENT isn't a bad idea.  It seems to lead the mind in the right
direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: leakproof at 2012-02-22 21:34:34 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

• Re: leakproof at 2012-02-23 00:41:37 from Robert Haas
• Re: leakproof at 2012-02-25 04:00:14 from Noah Misch

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jeff Davis	Date: 2012-02-22 23:36:48
	Subject: Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC
Previous:	From: Peter Geoghegan	Date: 2012-02-22 23:17:53
	Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2