Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Stephen Denne <Stephen(dot)Denne(at)datamail(dot)co(dot)nz>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-06-04 18:23:38
Message-ID: 27600.1212603818@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:17 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> These are already covered by the information in pg_control.

> Another thing that can change between systems is the collation behavior,
> which can corrupt indexes (and other bad things).

That is covered by pg_control, at least to the extent of forcing the
same value of LC_COLLATE.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-06-04 18:26:02
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-04 18:22:38
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-06-04 18:26:02
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2008-06-04 17:18:17
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group