Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com,"'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"'Tatsuo Ishii'" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org,austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-13 04:35:03
Message-ID: 27547.1076646903@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-pitr
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Tom recently posted the PITR patch to PATCHES - maybe we should sent it 
> to this list too. That might kick start the discussion...

Actually, I tried to send it here first.  This list bounced it because
it was over 40K (which I think is the standard limit for all the lists
except PATCHES).  So, if you want to look at it, go look in the PATCHES
archives:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-02/msg00134.php

(BTW, Marc, I still don't see an entry for the -pitr list at
http://archives.postgresql.org/ ...)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-02-13 04:35:48
Subject: Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-13 04:25:36
Subject: Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance

pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-02-13 04:37:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2004-02-13 04:29:28
Subject: Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group