From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Tatsuo Ishii'" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org, austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? |
Date: | 2004-02-13 04:35:03 |
Message-ID: | 27547.1076646903@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr |
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Tom recently posted the PITR patch to PATCHES - maybe we should sent it
> to this list too. That might kick start the discussion...
Actually, I tried to send it here first. This list bounced it because
it was over 40K (which I think is the standard limit for all the lists
except PATCHES). So, if you want to look at it, go look in the PATCHES
archives:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-02/msg00134.php
(BTW, Marc, I still don't see an entry for the -pitr list at
http://archives.postgresql.org/ ...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-13 04:35:48 | Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-13 04:25:36 | Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-13 04:37:32 | Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-02-13 04:29:28 | Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch |