Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: postmaster/postgres merge for testing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster/postgres merge for testing
Date: 2006-01-22 00:38:01
Message-ID: 2679.1137890281@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> (It's a bit weird in that src/backend already contains a postmaster 
> directory so you can't build a "postmaster" file there.  So in the 
> build tree it's called postmaster_.  Feel free to make better 
> suggestions.)

backend, maybe?  Or just keep calling it postgres at that point.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alfranio Correia JuniorDate: 2006-01-22 17:33:40
Subject: Re: strange behavior on locks
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-01-21 22:49:03
Subject: postmaster/postgres merge for testing

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2006-01-22 05:29:37
Subject: Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-01-21 22:49:03
Subject: postmaster/postgres merge for testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group