Re: WIP: pl/pgsql cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: pl/pgsql cleanup
Date: 2005-02-10 15:15:30
Message-ID: 26771.1108048530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 23:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That seems like a step backwards from the current behavior [...]

> Hmm, fair enough. Is this better?

Yeah, looks better, though I question the use of "embedded" in the
message --- seems a bit jargony. Are you going to post a revised patch?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-10 16:16:51 Re: [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] Instructions for FreeBSD ipc config showing
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-02-10 09:44:22 Re: Clarify use of NOW() in pl/pgsql docs