Re: pg_regress --temp-keep

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress --temp-keep
Date: 2004-10-18 17:06:57
Message-ID: 26712.1098119217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> Improving the performance would require to fix the install script so that
> it can handle more than one argument at once, and/or use a more or less
> standard "install" program when available.

We used to try to use the "standard" install program when available.
After sufficient bitter experience, we concluded that "standard" and
"install" are not words that should be used together.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 17:19:30 Re: additional GCC warning flags
Previous Message David Wheeler 2004-10-18 17:06:29 Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0