Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Barring making a fourth GUC variable to control them (which seems like
>> overkill), I think it's a reasonably sane definition to say "we count
>> these if any stats are being collected".  Doing what you propose would
>> simply expose an irrelevant implementation detail to users.

> OK.  Don't we need to document this somewhere?

No objection to that.  Probably section 24.2.1 is a reasonable place?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Checks for command string at 2006-01-02 01:11:27 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-01-02 01:17:15
	Subject: Re: Checks for command string
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-01-02 01:14:44
	Subject: Re: EINTR error in SunOS

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-01-02 01:17:15
	Subject: Re: Checks for command string
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-01-02 01:11:27
	Subject: Re: Checks for command string