Re: The may/can/might business

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The may/can/might business
Date: 2007-02-01 21:04:33
Message-ID: 26507.1170363873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> 3606c3606
>> < errmsg("aggregate function calls cannot be nested")));
>> ---
>> > errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
>>
>> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.

> Uh, I think you might be reading the diff backwards. The current CVS
> wording is "cannot".

Er ... duh. Sorry about that; got confused while merging with some
work-in-progress.

<emily litella>Never mind.</emily litella>

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Troy 2007-02-01 21:05:55 Re: The may/can/might business
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-01 20:52:58 Re: The may/can/might business