Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The may/can/might business

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The may/can/might business
Date: 2007-02-01 21:04:33
Message-ID: 26507.1170363873@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> 3606c3606
>> <                    errmsg("aggregate function calls cannot be nested")));
>> ---
>> >                    errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
>> 
>> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.

> Uh, I think you might be reading the diff backwards.  The current CVS
> wording is "cannot".

Er ... duh.  Sorry about that; got confused while merging with some
work-in-progress.

<emily litella>Never mind.</emily litella>

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard TroyDate: 2007-02-01 21:05:55
Subject: Re: The may/can/might business
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-01 20:52:58
Subject: Re: The may/can/might business

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group