From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? |
Date: | 2012-04-13 16:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 26316.1334335878@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> When do you think we will be ready for 9.2
>> beta?
> Well, we've got a bunch of open issues, but most of them don't look
> *too* serious. If everyone dropped what they're doing and worked on
> them, I think we could be done in 2 weeks, but realistically I think
> it's likely to take 1-2 months.
Well, I would sure like to see a beta out sooner than that. I don't
think we necessarily have to resolve every known open issue before
we put out beta1. I believe we do need to resolve anything that would
force initdb (such as Peter's bytea_agg change), and of course we need
to write release notes so that beta testers know what to test.
At the same time, I'd like to light a fire under people to deal with
the open issues. I agree that it will take some time for all of
them to get dealt with, but it doesn't help if the responsible hackers
are procrastinating.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-13 17:00:59 | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-13 16:48:45 | Re: [trivial patch] grammar fixes in doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml |