Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date: 2010-07-30 14:08:32
Message-ID: 25628.1280498912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com> writes:
> Sadly, I won't be able to provide much further analysis or
> information, because the box concerned is being wiped. The MD decided
> that, as a matter of corporate governance, he couldn't punt the
> company on PostgreSQL, so my experimenting days are over. Back to
> Oracle: slower, but with a support contract he can sue on, I guess!

Too bad. I'm sure EnterpriseDB or one of the other PG support companies
would be happy to sell you a support contract, if having somebody to sue
is an essential part of happiness.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Derrick Rice 2010-07-30 14:34:09 Re: select a list of column values directly into an array
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2010-07-30 13:51:51 Re: PostgreSQL keepalives help