Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 13:36:00
Message-ID: 25588.1306848960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...

> I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
> at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
> the archives.

Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search
mechanism doesn't suck as much or more. If you're unhappy with the
search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad
mechanism.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-05-31 13:43:33 Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-05-31 13:34:51 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project