From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
Date: | 2011-05-31 13:36:00 |
Message-ID: | 25588.1306848960@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
> I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
> at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
> the archives.
Please note, though, that there is no bug tracker anywhere whose search
mechanism doesn't suck as much or more. If you're unhappy with the
search stuff the solution is to improve it, not bring in another bad
mechanism.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-31 13:43:33 | Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-31 13:34:51 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |