Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Date: 2003-07-30 22:58:10
Message-ID: 25554.1059605890@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> I recoded the stuff as Tom recommended, leaving the non-pretty version 
> function names as they used to be, inventing new pg_get_XXXX_ext 
> functions for the extended stuff, and pushing the code down into 
> pg_get_XXXX_worker functions when needed. We now need the additional 
> prototype include patch from builtins.h.

Applied with some editorializing.  In particular, I don't believe the
original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-07-30 23:07:59
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-07-30 22:22:55
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: Why READ ONLY transactions?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group