Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Paul Vixie <paul(at)vix(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>,Vadim Kogan <vadim(at)xcf(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types.
Date: 2002-02-23 18:47:54
Message-ID: 25550.1014490074@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Please do *NOT* revert the output functions.  One of the MAJOR reasons
> for the change was to ALWAYS print ALL 4 octets of an IPv4 address in
> the default case.

AFAICT, Paul is not objecting to our adjustments to the I/O conventions.
What he wants is to find a way for the inner inet_{net_}{ntop,pton}
functions to remain identical to the ones in BIND, and do the
adjustments in the Postgres-specific wrapper routines.  I'm not sure how
important that is in reality, but I have no problem with trying...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-23 19:38:54
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-02-23 04:42:05
Subject: Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group