Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, "Ron Snyder" <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>,"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't
Date: 2002-08-27 13:08:23
Message-ID: 25391.1030453703@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> ... What exactly was it, why we don't want that ?
> Backwards compatibility ? Imho doing one (additional) grant after creating a db
> cannot be such a problem, no ? 

Breaking every existing pg_dumpall script doesn't strike you as a
problem?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-27 13:13:49
Subject: Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-27 13:06:52
Subject: Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group