Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date: 2004-11-01 20:55:46
Message-ID: 25185.1099342546@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Huh?  Why?

> Because we need to write the duplicated socket structure/pipe handle to
> the parameter file. I guess we could create a separate parameter file
> just for these things, but that seemed a bit unnecessary.

Do we actually need to pass the handle, or could the subprocess reopen
the pipe for itself?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 21:02:21
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 20:53:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 21:02:21
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 20:53:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group